when the rape allegations first appeared there was a lot of confusing information coming from the prosecution side which made it look suspicious: both women actually pursued Julian actively and later declared him to have raped them. The prosecutor herself activated a charge procedure without asking for the testominy of the accused. Her porte parole appeared on video with very incoherent allegations which contradicted themeselves. The tone of your artcile makes it sound like all was clear from the begining. I believe you are deeply dishonnest for reasons of you own: ideology, or someone paid you to make a smear campaign. WHich one is it?